View Single Post
Old 26 January 2005, 11:40 pm   #3
Rain
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
... Those are two completely different approaches to compressing audio and they should not be compared.
Thanks for the quick answer. :-)
The completely different approach was the reason for my question, because the aim is commonly, having "transparent" sound at 200 ... 380 kbps, so it is a fair comparison, but different techniques yield different strongnesses and weaknesses, asking just out of academical interest, and too lazy to do testing series at the moment. :-)
Rain is offline   Reply With Quote