putting fedora rpms on musepack.net

kuniklo · 14 December 2004, 11:12 pm

I've built some fedora rpms of the musepack tools (mppenc/mppdec/replaygain). Is there any interest in hosting these on musepack.net?

Shy · 15 December 2004, 04:40 pm

Unfortunately we can't host rpms/binaries for specific linux distributions. If we host rpms for Fedora, then questions like "why not mandrake too?" might arise, and it would be too much trouble.

kuniklo · 15 December 2004, 06:19 pm

Quote:

Unfortunately we can't host rpms/binaries for specific linux distributions. If we host rpms for Fedora, then questions like "why not mandrake too?" might arise, and it would be too much trouble.

I think it would be pretty easy to create a source rpm that would build on all the rpm-based distributions. Rarewares is already taking care of the debian derivatives.

xmixahlx · 16 December 2004, 09:22 am

i updated all the musepack files (plugins/library/binaries) for rarewares tonight while updating the frontpage.

just thought i'd poke my nose in here and say hi

p.s. src rpm packages make a lot of sense, but considering no musepack packages use a different environment i think it would be safe to say that a gcc3.2 or gcc2.95 build would be universal - (only needing the respective gcc base package)

later

Lefungus · 16 December 2004, 02:07 pm

Well, if someone take the trouble of providing and maintaining such rpms, it surely can be hosted here.
In a perfect world, we would host one rpm that work with Suse/Mandrake/Fedora

14 December 2004, 11:12 pm	#1
kuniklo Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Emeryville, CA Posts: 52	putting fedora rpms on musepack.net I've built some fedora rpms of the musepack tools (mppenc/mppdec/replaygain). Is there any interest in hosting these on musepack.net?

16 December 2004, 09:22 am	#4
xmixahlx Musepack developer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: seattle, washington usa Posts: 111	i updated all the musepack files (plugins/library/binaries) for rarewares tonight while updating the frontpage. just thought i'd poke my nose in here and say hi p.s. src rpm packages make a lot of sense, but considering no musepack packages use a different environment i think it would be safe to say that a gcc3.2 or gcc2.95 build would be universal - (only needing the respective gcc base package) later __________________ -xmixahlx, the one they call "mike" http://xmixahlx.com -\|- http://rarewares.org

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

15 December 2004, 04:40 pm	#2
Shy Admin Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 372	Unfortunately we can't host rpms/binaries for specific linux distributions. If we host rpms for Fedora, then questions like "why not mandrake too?" might arise, and it would be too much trouble.

16 December 2004, 02:07 pm	#5
Lefungus Procrastinator Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 131	Well, if someone take the trouble of providing and maintaining such rpms, it surely can be hosted here. In a perfect world, we would host one rpm that work with Suse/Mandrake/Fedora