Musepack Forums  

Go Back   Musepack Forums > Main > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08 September 2004, 11:41 am   #1
dZihan
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2
Default 1.14 or 1.15r?

Hi folks, nice forum by the way!

I just tried to compare both encoders to figure out, which of them does its job better, but this is pretty hard to tell.

1.15r produces slightly larger files, but accoustically they sound exactly the same to me.

I tried to ABX them with some nice Sennheisers but it is impossible to tell any difference for me.


Are there any opinions/views according to that question? As I assume the next release of Musepack could take quite some time still, I'd like to get the point about what's recommended now.

Thanks for your support!
dZihan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 September 2004, 11:52 am   #2
Seed
Musepack Nanny
 
Seed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 168
Default

1. Try to pick samples with very short transients. Electronic (mostly trance) music will benefit from 1.15r's different bit allocation methods. I'll provide samples that I found slightly better with 1.15r when I find my samples collection. I did post to Hydrogenaudio about one or two of those back in 2003. I am in the process of finding more (lots of ripping and careful listening)

2. Yes, if mppenc 1.2 comes out, it'll take a lot of time. It's not a simple matter of a few tweaks here and there, and it's not a full time-job for the programmer either.

3. I'd definitely go with 1.15r. It may produce up to 15% larger files for some types of music (not just electronic. Mark Knopfler's "Sailing to Philadelphia" for example) but the very few synthpop and electronic samples that sounded better to my ears at --extreme make it worth it. I did not encounter any samples that sound worse with 1.15r at --insane to my ears.
Seed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 September 2004, 11:10 pm   #3
dZihan
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2
Default

well, good point.

I tried it with classical music, which was rather slow and with flatter attack-ramps.

When I made the test with some electronic music or drum solos, I think I found the part you've ment...

Maybe not really pre-echo, but somehow closer to the original wav. Well, it seems to be worth sticking with 1.15r, but I'll do some further tests.

That "alpha" in the version sounds a bit 'unfinished', so I'll be careful and do more experimenting with that compile to be really sure it's ok.

Thanks for your help anyways, it's highly appreciated!
dZihan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:54 pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.