XMMS and BMP plugins and libmusepack 1.0.2

Mr_Rabid_Teddybear · 25 September 2004, 04:30 pm

With the 1.1 alpha 9 version of the XMMS and BMP plugins the text "requires libmusepack" have been removed from the Linux section. Also the tarball version of libmuspack have been removed from the Linux section. It's easy to belive libmusepack is no longer required. But on the newspage it says "Both require the new libmusepack 1.0.2 ". It's rather confusing. I think that a tarballversion of libmusepack and also the text "requires libmusepack" with XMMS and BMP plugins should be reintroduced to the Linux section for as long as libmusepack are required. Or at least a tar.bz2 version under the Source Code/Lib section and some explaining in the plugins description fields pointing there.

Thanks!

The_Paranoid · 25 September 2004, 06:36 pm

mmmh, for me there is the text "requires Libmusepack". Where libmusepack is a link to the Source Code/Lib Page

Mr_Rabid_Teddybear · 26 September 2004, 12:04 am

Obviously, yes. Don't know whether I was blind before, or if Firefoxes' cache got me again or something. :shock:
Still I think it could be clearer. Also, eventhough most distros probably comes with unzip these days, I think most Linux/BSD users expects a tarball. But that's maybe bordering on knitpicking and sorry 'bout that... :wink:

25 September 2004, 04:30 pm	#1
Mr_Rabid_Teddybear Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Bergen, Norway Posts: 17	XMMS and BMP plugins and libmusepack 1.0.2 With the 1.1 alpha 9 version of the XMMS and BMP plugins the text "requires libmusepack" have been removed from the Linux section. Also the tarball version of libmuspack have been removed from the Linux section. It's easy to belive libmusepack is no longer required. But on the newspage it says "Both require the new libmusepack 1.0.2 ". It's rather confusing. I think that a tarballversion of libmusepack and also the text "requires libmusepack" with XMMS and BMP plugins should be reintroduced to the Linux section for as long as libmusepack are required. Or at least a tar.bz2 version under the Source Code/Lib section and some explaining in the plugins description fields pointing there. Thanks!

25 September 2004, 06:36 pm	#2
The_Paranoid Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Germany, Tübingen Posts: 14	mmmh, for me there is the text "requires Libmusepack". Where libmusepack is a link to the Source Code/Lib Page __________________ Close the world, txEn eht nepO

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
New libmusepack, XMMS & BMP plugins (BSD license/C code)	Seed	General	3	23 January 2005 04:55 pm

26 September 2004, 12:04 am	#3
Mr_Rabid_Teddybear Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Bergen, Norway Posts: 17	Obviously, yes. Don't know whether I was blind before, or if Firefoxes' cache got me again or something. :shock: Still I think it could be clearer. Also, eventhough most distros probably comes with unzip these days, I think most Linux/BSD users expects a tarball. But that's maybe bordering on knitpicking and sorry 'bout that... :wink: