Musepack Forums  

Go Back   Musepack Forums > Main > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 23 May 2005, 09:16 pm   #1
Hellygator
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2
Default Will Musepack support 96kHz?

Hi there! I'm a big Fan of Musepack and i use it for quite some time to store my Music. The only Problem i have is my Soundcard, a Creative Audigy 2 ZS which gives me really audible distortions on playback of any 44.1 kHz Sample/Music. For the Moment i use an output plugin for Winamp to upsample to 96kHz, which is the DSP Frequency or something. I don't really know or care, but it makes the distortions go away. BUT: It takes LOTS of CPU-Power. So Finally: If Musepack supported 96kHz i could work this around. Will Musepack implement 96kHz support in the (hopefully not too far) future?
Hellygator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 May 2005, 02:44 am   #2
Shy
Admin
 
Shy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 372
Default

It will most likely not. Support for 96khz is not a high priority. The reason: Even 44.1khz is a range well above what people can hear, and Musepack supports up to 48khz.
96khz is mainly for audio production, not playback. Whoever decides to make it a "standard" for playback makes a suboptimal, useless choise. Professionals require the ability to be able to downsample audio while keeping it high quality, that's why some products support 192khz and even much higher. No lossy audio codec is a proper format for storing raw, editing suitable audio. Lossy formats are meant for playback of end products and live content.

As for your resampling problem with the Audigy 2 ZS card, it sounds weird that its resampling would distort audio so noticeably. Perhaps something in the software/driver configuration causes it. A good place to find any possible information about it or ask for help is the audio hardware forum on Hydrogenaudio.

And as for a high quality fast resampler, I don't know any for Winamp, but for foobar2000 there is PPHS. You could inquire this on Hydrogenaudio as well.
Shy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 June 2005, 04:57 pm   #3
necropimp
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1
Default

here's the easiest solution... DON'T resample to 96KHz... with creative soundcards it's best to resample to 48KHz since otherwise the soundcard would resample it and the resampling done by the card results in worse sound quality than a good software resampler
necropimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2005, 01:05 am   #4
Lost Angel
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bremen, Deutschland
Posts: 11
Send a message via ICQ to Lost Angel Send a message via MSN to Lost Angel
Default

would the encoder than have an option (or will automatically do so) to downsample a wav to 48khz instead of giving an error message? Or this is also not a priority?
__________________
Rain... Night... Musique...
Lost Angel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2005, 07:08 am   #5
xmixahlx
Musepack developer
 
xmixahlx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: seattle, washington usa
Posts: 111
Send a message via ICQ to xmixahlx
Default

right now, the musepack format is in sort of a dead development stage - no one is working on the psymodel/quality functions, and only bugs are being fixed.

there are many "ideas" and "plans" to further the format into more usable libraries and extend features, but no one has a definitive timeframe.

the short answer is no. it isn't a priority


later
__________________
-xmixahlx, the one they call "mike"
http://xmixahlx.com -|- http://rarewares.org
xmixahlx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2005, 02:11 pm   #6
Kamen
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 19
Default

I also think 96kHz sampling isn't needed. Refer to the Nyquist's theorem. :P 96kHz and more is for studio usage, as it was mentioned, in order to allow many lossless manipulations over the material. That's not the purpose of Musepack / MPEGplus, I think... Its craft is in the emulating the psychoacoustic model of our hearing to achieve the same perceptual quality as the final original record... in lower size. And it even supports 48kHz sampling frequency (which is used by DAT).
Kamen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mp3infp modified to support musepack files kmart MPC for Windows 3 15 November 2011 01:03 pm
Any interest in support for MusePack in Raptor Audio raptor_cdripper General 3 13 March 2005 09:45 pm
Xine now supports Musepack quimbaya MPC for UNIX 3 24 January 2005 11:28 pm
Gstreamer plugin for musepack Lefungus MPC for UNIX 11 07 November 2004 11:37 pm
musepack support for prokyon3 mkalkbrenner MPC for UNIX 3 07 September 2004 09:06 am


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:46 pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.